Demand and supply at the frontier #
Every lower bound proved by the frontier method ends with the same comparison. On one side is
the demand of the problem: every layout of the graph of a circuit for it must, at some time,
have a frontier of about n edges, the information that must cross from the inputs read to
the inputs not yet read. On the other side is the supply of the layout hypothesis: the graph
of a circuit of size s has cycle rank about s - n, so it has a layout whose frontiers carry
at most about A (s - n) edges. Demand cannot exceed supply, so n ≤ A (s - n), that is,
s ≥ (1 + 1/A) n.
Frontier.eventually_lt_of_demand makes this precise with every lower-order term in place. The
slack η of the layout hypothesis is chosen first, depending only on A, ε, and a constant
κ bounding the size of the graph; the constant C of the layout hypothesis and the error
e(n) = o(n) of the problem come afterwards.
Main results #
Frontier.eventually_lt_of_demand: demandn - o(n)and supplyA (s - n + o(n)) + o(n)forces > (1 + 1/A - ε) n.Frontier.isLittleO_log_affine:log (α n + β) = o(n).
Demand and supply at the frontier. Fix A > 0, ε > 0, and a constant κ ≥ 0. For every
small enough slack η > 0, every constant C, and every error e(n) = o(n), for all large n
the following holds. If a graph with v ≤ κ (n + s + 1) vertices has a layout of width w
that is
- at least the demand:
n ≤ w + e(n) + κ log (v + 1), and - at most the supply:
w ≤ (A + η) (s - n + e(n)) + η v + C,
then s > (1 + 1/A - ε) n.
In applications, s is (r - 1) times the number of gates of a circuit of fan-in r, the
supply is the layout hypothesis applied to a graph of cycle rank at most s - n + e(n), and the
demand is a counting argument for the problem. The slack is chosen before the layout hypothesis
provides C.