Finite evaluation-code parameter selection #
The field width must satisfy two competing requirements. Its interpolation
grid must hold all 2^prefixWidth prefix bits, while the number of resource
bits must remain within a dimension-dependent constant factor of that same
quantity. Choosing a merely convenient large field would lose a factor of
prefixWidth and therefore destroy the final 2^n / n bound.
We consequently choose the least field width above a fixed safe floor which satisfies the exact packing inequality. This is nonuniform parameter selection, not a run-time computation, and introduces no instances.
A safe dimension-dependent floor for the binary-extension width.
Equations
- Algebraic.MassProduction.CodeParameters.baseWidth dimension = 2 * dimension + 2
Instances For
A coarse explicit candidate used only to prove that minimal parameter selection is nonempty.
Equations
Instances For
Exact admissibility predicate for a binary-extension width.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Least admissible binary-extension width above baseWidth.
Equations
- Algebraic.MassProduction.CodeParameters.fieldWidth prefixWidth dimension dimensionPositive = Nat.find ⋯
Instances For
A division-based upper bound on the least admissible field width.
The selected field cardinality is a fixed dimension-dependent factor
times the ideal 2^(prefixWidth / dimension) rate.
Raising the selected field cardinality to the fixed code dimension costs only a fixed factor beyond the prefix truth-table size.
Packing forces the selected field width to carry at least the prefix
information rate. The extra + 1 accounts for the basis-bit coordinate in
the packed grid.
Minimality preserves the code rate #
Dimension-dependent constant in the resource-count estimate.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
Minimal field selection keeps the exact number of (point, bit)
resources within a fixed dimension-dependent factor of 2^prefixWidth.
Projective-direction capacity and finite composition #
The projective direction space contains at least the top term of its geometric cardinality sum.
A simple exponential load inequality implies the exact scheduler direction-capacity hypothesis.
Composition with the least admissible field width and canonical routing bookkeeping.